|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Catholic Relief Services
- Catholic Medical Missions Board
- Interchurch Medical Assistance
- Institute of Human Virology/University of Maryland School of Medicine
- Futures Group
|
|
3
|
- The Global AIDS fund, WHO’s 3 by
5 Program and the PEPFAR each are poised to accelerate access to
antiretroviral therapy particularly in resource constrained countries
confronting HIV/AIDS.
|
|
4
|
- $317 million spent on research
- $547 million to global aids fund
- $845 million to PEPFAR countries
|
|
5
|
- Providing durable ART therapy in terms of decades
- Providing treatment that is scalable in terms of 100,000s of patients
- The urgent need to begin expanding treatment programs in the setting of
few local experienced ART providers and few continuity clinics
- Limited evidence based data, in the different targeted populations, to
guide clinical decision making process
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- PEPFAR
- 67,000 directly supported by 300 USG supported health facilities
- Only 40,000 “new” patients directly supported
- MSF 12,058 patients on ARV
- AIDSRelief supports a reported
- 15,500 patients directly “supported”
- over 12,000 “new” patients
- 54 sites
|
|
9
|
- Country
AIDS AIDSRelief %
- Total ART* Releif** of ART PTs
- Guyana 400 49
12.25%
Haiti 2800 156
5.57%
Kenya 8000
4403 55.04%
Nigeria 5700
831 14.58%
Rwanda 4200
0 0.00%
So.Africa 4900 2537 51.78%
Tanzania 1500 756
50.40%
Uganda 26400
5847 22.15%
Zambia 3400 977
28.74%
Total 57,300 15,556 27%
- * From PEPFAR Annual Report to Congress
** From AIDSRelief Dec 04-Feb 05 Quarterly Reports to CDC
|
|
10
|
- Decentralized faith based healthcare infrastructure:
- very few tertiary referral
hospitals
- working with mostly small rural
mission hospitals,
- rural dispensaries run by nursing staff,
- home based care projects with community nurse support only
- Different treatment populations:
- from pregnant women,
- infants, children,
- very advanced AIDS,
- previous treatment experienced patients, significant SD NVP exposure,
- to asymptomatic ambulatory patients
- Markedly different socioeconomic factors:
- from working urban residents, to
displaced refugees with enormous food insecurities.
|
|
11
|
- Ensuring equal access to quality care in a decentralized health care
infrastructure
- The need to not forfeit quality clinical care in the process
|
|
12
|
- “The reason for high mortality rates at some sites is simple but
depressing: Patients become ill because of TB or some other OI;
they think they may have HIV; they attend VCT; they present to an ART
program faced with targets and bereft of basic diagnostic capabilities;
they are placed on ART; they die of the OI or of immune reconstitution
syndrome.”
- J. Fielder, Kijabe Hospital Kenya
|
|
13
|
- ARV drug related costs are estimated to be less than 30% of total care
package to support ART.
- “Drug costs are no longer the fundamental obstacle for treatment” PEPFAR
congressional report
|
|
14
|
- Little experience exists in the treatment of HIV outside of developed
world
- This is particularly severe for treatment of children
- building clinical capacity/ experience in medical, lab, and basic
sciences was not adequately addressed prior to availability for ARV
drugs
- Real mentored medical education of MD, RN, lab, other health care
professional
- Lab diagnostic systems, evaluation systems, information systems, drug
procurement/distribution,
logistic systems, are costly and were non existent in many cases
- simple medical records do not exist at many treatment facilities
|
|
15
|
- Efforts to date are using the experienced providers to maximal degree
and utilized the “best” sites to have treated the current patients
- Ability to reach beyond established programs, beyond tertiary govt.
referral hospitals and into rural settings, small mission hospitals,
small govt. hospitals will take an enormous amount of experienced human
resources, concerted and reasoned planning and monetary resources.
|
|
16
|
- Rapid and lasting improvement in clinical capacity
- Breaking paradigm that physicians have to complete initial patient
encounter and prescribe ARV
- Strong emphasis on patient preparation and family directed care
|
|
17
|
- Improving what we have
- Initiate process to foster existing provider expertise.
- 2. Building new sustainable
capacity
- Increase treatment expertise
throughout the decentralized network
- 3. Increase utilization of all
medical personnel
- 4. Support after training
- Maintaining continuous communication and QA/QI process
|
|
18
|
- Already there exists outstanding HIV care programs and experienced
providers within AIDSRelief.
- Some sites have different strengths, being large volume management,
adherence treatment support programs, clinically strong medical
director, well organized nurse based home based care programs
- Developing these sites into “centers of excellence” to support scale up
of new sites in the surrounding area.
- Allows for a modeling approach for development of a treatment plan for
initiating AVR and provides a training center for new/novice providers
to gain clinical experience in a supportive setting
|
|
19
|
- Equip existing community nursing /community health workers with:
- Clear identification/ establishment of expectations of what different
levels of providers should be accomplishing.
- Integrate staff to improve overall efficiency of continuity of care
- Build fund of knowledge and improve clinical judgment
- What is critical, what should be addressed immediately, what should be
referred, etc….
|
|
20
|
- Acceptance of HIV status
- Spousal and guardian disclosure/notification
- Willing to be visited at home
- Referral by community health worker/patients
- Compliance with multiple clinic visits
- Septrin pill counts
- Pill box
- Attendance at treatment preparation seminar
|
|
21
|
- Prior to ARVs,
- Counseling is done
- Home visits performed
- Pill counts are performed
- Family support assessed
- Frequent home visits emphasized for first few weeks following ARV
initiation
- DOT for 2-4 weeks
- Home visits 3X week until improvement
|
|
22
|
- Most patients well-prepared to start ARVs
- Better acceptance of HIV status
- Higher compliance compared with previously treated patients
- Patient and family understanding of HIV and ART greatly increased after
treatment preparation seminar
- Follow-up is facilitated through home visits and support groups
|
|
23
|
- Strong community referral networks with trained community health workers
- Pre-existing Home visits by nurse and adherence staff, now including
HIV-positive persons
- A network of support groups
- Standardized treatment preparation
- Team cohesion with frequent meetings (community and clinical)
- Emphasis on diagnosis and treatment of opportunistic infections,
particularly CNS infections and TB
- Pre-existing hospital infrastructure has been vital in this regard
- Clinicians dedicated to providing comprehensive care
|
|
24
|
- “Tuesday we reviewed the files of 34 patients from a rural and
impoverished area who are currently on ARVs. There had not been
one missed appointment among this cohort (we did have one default and
one death from this region). We just started our first mobile
clinic to this region; the project vehicle is key to reaching patients
and providing access to care.”
|
|
25
|
- Slower enrollment
- Process sometimes must be compromised to reach patient targets
- A few patients feel stigmatized
- More expensive initially (staffing)
- In the long run, will be less expensive by preventing resistance, need
for second line regimens, and hospitalizations
|
|
26
|
- Kijabe Hospital-Kenya
- Individual counseling is done by the nurse, social worker, or clinician
- Guardian required
- Disclosure required
- Treatment preparation seminar is mandatory
- Barriers to adherence questionnaire and treatment contract emphasize
important points prior to initiation
- Home visits, especially early in the course of therapy, and support
groups are crucial
- Post-pharmacy counseling done for all patients until stable
- Pill box and medication chart filled
- Pills counted prior to departure from hospital
- Regimen explained
- Nutrition assistance (now under private funding) distributed to needy
patients
|
|
27
|
- “I should state that not all patients…do well.
- Some just never understand, or are never able to understand, because of
cognitive dysfunction induced by HIV and/or an OI. Others have
such weak social supports that the burden of the disease and ART is just
too great. But these are the uncommon exceptions in our program.
- Community efforts can have a
tremendous transformative effect when it comes to stigma and
compliance. ” Fielder
|
|
28
|
- Devolving care of stable patients to sites closer to patients’ homes
through mobile clinics, dispensaries, and community health workers
- Besides stigma, the biggest obstacle we face is transport.
- Utilization of best available antiretroviral agents
- over emphasis on immediate cost to access ARVs driving unfavorable
regimen selection
- Identifying HIV and beginning
treatment earlier in the disease process
- Guidelines for ARV initiation for only symptomatic patients severely
complicating and increasing costs of medical care
|
|
29
|
- The pathway to achieve long term durable benefits of antiretroviral
therapy in different settings remains to be defined
- Durability of ARV induced viral control in the end will determine
ultimate access, scalability and sustainability of current and future
ARV programs.
|